| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Remaining 9.5 open items |
| Date: | 2015-12-04 15:16:44 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jKSaRTvQU+=TOqOR8BPf9XxmgfS5zjFiyy8J3K=dfC73w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1 December 2015 at 17:05, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> do we want to
> back-patch those changes to 9.5 at this late date?
>
Surely the whole point of a release process is to fix issues in the
release. If we don't ever dare put something in the release, we may as well
have released it earlier.
I'm thinking about a two stage release process...
Stage 1 - released, but with caveats and some parts marked
experimental/beta whatever
Stage 2 - released, all caveats resolved
Not sure what to call that.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-12-04 15:23:06 | Re: Confusing results with lateral references |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-12-04 15:10:02 | Re: Support of partial decompression for datums |