| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention |
| Date: | 2015-06-30 06:23:58 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jK-FavTZ0zGPyfEtx2DpegaVYcy++Z31HWtw07rE6ixxg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 30 June 2015 at 04:21, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Now, I would like to briefly explain how allow-one-waker idea has
> helped to improve the patch as not every body here was present
> in that Un-conference.
>
The same idea applies for marking commits in clog, for which I have been
sitting on a patch for a month or so and will post now I'm done travelling.
These ideas have been around some time and are even listed on the
PostgreSQL TODO:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-09/msg00206.php
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2015-06-30 06:28:47 | Re: LWLock deadlock and gdb advice |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-06-30 06:19:57 | Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention |