| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
| Date: | 2015-07-15 07:01:23 |
| Message-ID: | CANP8+jJnjPqtiCqyDkHawcmm-j=3SPYKqdpCrchhy83fnwwSkg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 29 June 2015 at 18:40, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm in favor of a more robust and sophisticated synch rep. But not if
> nobody not on this mailing list can configure it, and not if even we
> don't know what it will do in an actual failure situation.
That's the key point. Editing the config after a failure is a Failure of
Best Practice in an HA system.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kouhei Kaigai | 2015-07-15 07:08:01 | Re: ctidscan as an example of custom-scan (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API) |
| Previous Message | Yourfriend | 2015-07-15 07:01:18 | Re: Could be improved point of UPSERT |