Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Venkata Balaji N <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments
Date: 2015-05-21 16:02:02
Message-ID: CANP8+jJL1=fPhioRgF6o8vzYe9uwETZzqbYY6PvkzoL8GvX7Hg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 21 May 2015 at 02:53, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I think the old behavior, where restartpoints were driven only by time and
> not by volume, was a misfeature.
>

I have no objection to changing that. The main essence of that was to
ensure that a standby could act differently to a master, given different
settings.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-05-21 16:06:36 Re: Postgres and TLSv1.2
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-05-21 15:47:52 Re: GROUPING