Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date: 2015-07-02 13:48:50
Message-ID: CANP8+jJ26_BaFTEe2YokzbTNA6GKnwvnCg2BJJ2u+ONN-8_niw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2 July 2015 at 09:44, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I am not sure how combining both will work out.
>

Use cases needed.

> Catalog Method:
> Is it safe to assume we may not going ahead with the Catalog approach?
>

Yes

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
<http://www.2ndquadrant.com/>
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-07-02 13:51:59 Re: Reducing the size of BufferTag & remodeling forks
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2015-07-02 13:45:25 Re: WALWriter active during recovery