Re: often PREPARE can generate high load (and sometimes minutes long unavailability)

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: often PREPARE can generate high load (and sometimes minutes long unavailability)
Date: 2014-02-24 20:31:57
Message-ID: CAMkU=1zLY=dHyoeQ5jRUwJ=jOK_iw7J5oPFzp_5bc1wHmNz41g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:

>
>
>
> 2014-02-23 21:32 GMT+01:00 Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> On 2014-02-23 20:04:39 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> > There is relative few very long ProcArrayLocks lwlocks
>> >
>> > This issue is very pathologic on fast computers with more than 8 CPU.
>> This
>> > issue was detected after migration from 8.4 to 9.2. (but tested with
>> same
>> > result on 9.0) I see it on devel 9.4 today actualized.
>> >
>> > When I moved PREPARE from cycle, then described issues is gone. But
>> when I
>> > use a EXECUTE IMMEDIATELY, then the issue is back. So it looks it is
>> > related to planner, ...
>>
>> In addition to the issue Jeff mentioned, I'd suggest trying the same
>> workload with repeatable read. That can do *wonders* because of the
>> reduced number of snapshots.
>>
>>
> I tested it, and it doesn't help.
>
> Is there some patch, that I can test related to this issue?
>

This is the one that I was referring to:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/11927.1384199294@sss.pgh.pa.us

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-02-24 20:34:13 Re: typemode for variable types
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-02-24 20:24:10 Re: typemode for variable types