Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system
Date: 2013-02-03 19:46:39
Message-ID: CAMkU=1yrkPe8KRaGSt+E03Y7M_W+gyO6Gwy9fh9MHNX60js7kg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> wrote:
> On 3.1.2013 20:33, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, +1 for a separate directory not in global.
>
> OK, I moved the files from "global/stat" to "stat".

Why "stat" rather than "pg_stat"?

The existence of "global" and "base" as exceptions already annoys me.
(Especially when I do a tar -xf in my home directory without
remembering the -C flag). Unless there is some unstated rule behind
what gets a pg_ and what doesn't, I think we should have the "pg_".

Cheers,

Jeff

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-02-03 20:38:39 sepgsql and materialized views
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2013-02-03 19:34:24 Re: proposal - assign result of query to psql variable