Re: BUG #16098: unexplained autovacuum to prevent wraparound

From: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alessandro Ferraresi <alessandro(dot)ferraresi1(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #16098: unexplained autovacuum to prevent wraparound
Date: 2019-11-08 16:11:50
Message-ID: CAMkU=1xB_doNVEDAfC6v=PDf2csYirqnPiwdQ_dKEKCsu_fw1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 12:11 PM Alessandro Ferraresi <
alessandro(dot)ferraresi1(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> Here you go:
>
> pgxxxxx=> show vacuum_freeze_table_age;
> vacuum_freeze_table_age
> -------------------------
> 150000000
>

I can't think of any other innocent explanations, so maybe it is a bug.
But if it were easy to hit, I'd expect it to have been noticed before now.

Can you reproduce it readily?

Cheers,

Jeff

>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergei Kornilov 2019-11-08 16:59:07 Re: BUG #16102: Table can't be drop on PostgreSQL 10.09 if the table was created from PostgreSQL 10.10
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2019-11-08 15:47:53 Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE not displaying recheck condition