| From: | Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joy Arulraj <jarulraj(at)cs(dot)cmu(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | kang joni <kangjoni76(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: C++ port of Postgres |
| Date: | 2016-08-16 04:39:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAMjNa7e7E81T3NqoReixYxrCFQpfWd+Mht0NhetW3bJB=Gs7Og@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Just wondering what the end goal is for this project... Is it to just
maintain an up to date Postgres fork that will compile with a C++ compiler?
Is it to get a conversation going for a direction for Postgres itself to
move? The former I don't see gaining much traction or doing all that much
for the state of the project. The latter possibly could if the community
gets on board.
Thanks,
-Adam
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | James Sewell | 2016-08-16 05:10:04 | Re: Critical failure of standby |
| Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2016-08-16 02:36:03 | Re: Critical failure of standby |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2016-08-16 04:45:47 | Re: Fix comment in ATExecValidateConstraint |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2016-08-16 04:19:51 | Re: Why --backup-and-modify-in-place in perltidy config? |