Re: Bloat and Slow Vacuum Time on Toast

From: Ken Caruso <ken(at)ipl31(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bloat and Slow Vacuum Time on Toast
Date: 2011-07-20 02:17:13
Message-ID: CAMg8r_qzSRYkJsL6mPTa3z2nZ9x+Udkk+SYAwtvSbnXWgjTbQQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Ken Caruso <ken(at)ipl31(dot)net> writes:
> > I am trying to trouble shoot a couple of issue related to vacuum and db
> > size. I currently have a postgres DB that is around 390GB on disk (du -hs
> in
> > $PG_DATA/base). If I look at the total relation size using the following
> > query:
>
> > SELECT SUM(pg_relation_size(pg_class.oid))
> > FROM pg_class ;
>
> > This says the total size is around 191GB. That query should sum all of
> the
> > tables, toast and indexes AFAIK.
>
> What PG version?
>

9.0.4

-Ken

>
> If it's a version with multiple table forks, you're only counting the
> main forks, not FSM or VM.
>
> Theoretically the latter two should be pretty small relative to the main
> fork, but obviously you are missing something with this query ...

> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-07-20 03:12:26 Re: Bloat and Slow Vacuum Time on Toast
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-07-19 21:27:40 Re: Bloat and Slow Vacuum Time on Toast