Re: Bug in bttext_abbrev_convert()

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Bug in bttext_abbrev_convert()
Date: 2015-07-01 05:38:47
Message-ID: CAM3SWZTvEtVDysXeE7Py-8Ar+-+XRAPkJCZe-FH_V+zWxmuS9A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> The regression tests have zero coverage for this
> tuplesort_performsort() "btspool2" case. That's a fairly common case
> to have no coverage for, and that took me all of 5 minutes to find.

BTW, I looked here because I added a bunch of sortsupport stuff to
_bt_load() in 9.5. It appears that that new code is entirely without
coverage.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2015-07-01 05:52:59 Re: WAL-related tools and .paritial WAL file
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2015-07-01 05:37:23 Re: Parallel Seq Scan