Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
Subject: Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
Date: 2015-03-23 21:46:55
Message-ID: CAM3SWZTATtgWoj1GadB__wsGK_UkLfbRhdfAL8aooQSvc5XoVg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Gierth
<andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote:
> Peter> As I said, I don't really consider that my patch is a rewrite,
> Peter> especially V4, which changes nothing substantive except removing
> Peter> 32-bit support.
>
> Well, that's a hell of an "except".

I guess you're right. I'm willing to go with whatever the consensus is
on that question.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2015-03-23 22:02:04 Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2015-03-23 21:42:37 Re: logical column ordering