Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little
Date: 2015-10-03 17:07:49
Message-ID: CAM3SWZT3DnodaTzpL7_r5kXvgEraJWOT_QZ=_DDOZ=oNm9OJww@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I'm not arguing against any of this - but I don't think this needs to be
> on the 9.5 open items list. I plan to remove from there.

Obviously I don't think that this is a critical fix. I do think that
it would be nice to keep the branches in sync, and that might become a
bit more difficult after 9.5 is released.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-10-03 18:05:03 Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-10-03 16:48:58 Re: creating extension including dependencies