Re: 9.5 release notes

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.5 release notes
Date: 2015-06-13 22:53:43
Message-ID: CAM3SWZSp+LExgbMVO6cA64TpoGLVEfLAPC1H_k=XrqMdpNPVRQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm not sure if it's worth mentioning the "cheap equality for text"
> commit (e246b3d6eac09). I guess that it probably is, because it will
> help with things like index scans, too. Arguably that isn't a sorting
> thing (it's certainly not *just* a sorting thing).

I think we should really address this. Attached patch adds a new
release note item for it. It also adds to the documentation that
explains why users should prefer varchar(n)/text to character(n); the
lack of abbreviated key support now becomes a huge disadvantage for
character(n), whereas in previous versions the disadvantages were
fairly minor.

In passing, I updated the existing sort item to reflect that only
varchar(n), text, and numeric benefit from the abbreviation
optimization (not character types more generally + numeric), and added
a note on the effectiveness of the abbreviation optimization alone.

--
Peter Geoghegan

Attachment Content-Type Size
release-note-sort.patch text/x-patch 2.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-06-13 23:18:26 Re: 9.5 release notes
Previous Message Emre Hasegeli 2015-06-13 21:04:00 Re: point_ops for GiST