Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little
Date: 2015-07-20 01:31:23
Message-ID: CAM3SWZSAT3+EY0D9f4DETmmi2585=urkRxEjSJZSnfgDXdujQA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> As with row locking, with insertion, if there is a conflict, any
> outcome (UPDATE or INSERT) is then possible.

Where are we on this? It would be nice to get this out of the way
before a 9.5 beta is put out.

Thanks
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2015-07-20 03:00:48 Re: Implementation of global temporary tables?
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-07-20 00:56:07 Re: Arguable RLS security bug, EvalPlanQual() paranoia