Re: Should TIDs be typbyval = FLOAT8PASSBYVAL to speed up CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should TIDs be typbyval = FLOAT8PASSBYVAL to speed up CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY?
Date: 2015-12-12 19:50:00
Message-ID: CAM3SWZS3YXCZrPwbFzZGYExdqZzsm0QzjjXjVvWVfb+u5hHHNQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I ask because CIC statements that run in seconds on our staging machine can
> take many hours on our production machine, when most of the access is just
> reads, though those reads may have been part of a larger transaction that
> did updates elsewhere.

I don't think it's necessary to simulate any other load.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2015-12-12 20:25:24 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Handle policies during DROP OWNED BY
Previous Message Greg Stark 2015-12-12 19:47:16 Re: Using quicksort for every external sort run