| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New CF app deployment |
| Date: | 2015-02-16 02:46:15 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZS3RALThjA7MPuoZzUNjaNqoDK+GiyOLKKtnH8kip25Zw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> I think the old system where the patch submitter declared, this message
> contains my patch, is the only one that will work.
I tend to agree. That being said, calling out latest attachments is
also useful (or highlighting that a particular mail has a particular
file attached in general).
Annotations-wise, I think that it would be nice to be able to modify
an annotation, in case a typo is made (the old app supported this). I
also think that it's a waste of screen space to show "who" within the
annotation view. Granted, the old app supported this, but I tend to
think that if I actually cared who added a certain annotation, I'd be
happy to drill down into history. I haven't cared so far, AFAICR.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2015-02-16 03:03:08 | Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW |
| Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2015-02-16 02:38:04 | Re: Really bad blowups with hash outer join and nulls |