Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)aiven(dot)io>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Tripp <peter(at)chartio(dot)com>, Virendra Negi <virendra(at)idyllic-software(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple
Date: 2016-08-19 00:37:28
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRunQoeSXR_vekMTs-SUSPc4nrWAE3eBdW92p+AcdGQmA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The existing accommodation is support for multiple expected-files.
> Do you have a better idea?

I guess not. Nevermind.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 甄明洋 2016-08-19 03:18:37 Re:Re: Re: Re: Re:Re: [BUGS] Re: [BUGS] Return value error of‘to_timestamp’
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-08-19 00:37:26 Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple