| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)aiven(dot)io>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Tripp <peter(at)chartio(dot)com>, Virendra Negi <virendra(at)idyllic-software(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple |
| Date: | 2016-08-19 00:37:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20160819003726.s5jsx2b7u67xzzor@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 2016-08-18 13:43:42 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-08-18 16:38:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > > On 2016-08-17 21:45:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> guaibasaurus thinks this test is still underdetermined.
> >
> > > The easiest solution here seems to be another expected file - playing
> > > around a few minutes, I couldn't see an easier solution. Better ideas?
> >
> > If you think the two outcomes are equally valid, sure.
>
> Both are valid, yes. Will do that.
And pushed. Thanks Tom and Alvaro for notifying.
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-08-19 00:37:28 | Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-08-18 21:09:27 | Re: BUG #14150: Attempted to delete invisible tuple |