Re: UPSERT on partition

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: UPSERT on partition
Date: 2015-06-24 18:03:49
Message-ID: CAM3SWZR_1ByPutde4K9aDQMEqVmfh_0nmk3phgJ0Cj3RkPuaPQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> I think that the real way to fix this is, as you say, to make it so
> that it isn't necessary in general to write trigger functions like
> this to make inheritance work.

Excuse me -- I mean to make *partitioning* work.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2015-06-24 18:18:03 Re: Trustly PostgreSQL Data Corruption Bug Bounty Program
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2015-06-24 18:03:10 Re: pg_stat_*_columns?