| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New CF app deployment |
| Date: | 2015-01-26 20:54:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZRS6KAGXfAzUjZ9U6J8aimJ6TgprWXayQowC1CgZGMobw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Well, I can't speak to anyone else's opinion, but I'm quite sure I
> raised the issue that we need a way to call out which messages in the
> thread are important, and I think that's pretty much what Peter is
> saying, too.
It is.
> I find the new tool essentially unusable - having one
> link to the whole thread instead of individual links to just the
> important messages in that thread is a huge regression for me, as is
> the lack of the most recent activity on the summary page.
Yes, the lack of the most recent activity is also a major omission.
I like some things about the new app. The general idea of having the
mailing list traffic drive the commitfest app is a good one. However,
it seems we've gone too far. I strongly feel that the two regressions
called out here are big problems.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-01-26 20:59:42 | Re: PL/pgSQL, RAISE and error context |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-01-26 20:46:56 | Re: Partitioning: issues/ideas (Was: Re: On partitioning) |