Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-core <pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode
Date: 2015-06-07 02:14:44
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRLPEoANcqRxy-b37PkZm5Pyyu4hAGoqeeb-tn7RjqNZg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Perhaps we're honoring this more in the breech than in the observance,
> but I'm not making up what Tom has said about this:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/27310.1251410965@sss.pgh.pa.us
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/19174.1299782543@sss.pgh.pa.us
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3413.1301154369@sss.pgh.pa.us
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3261.1401915832@sss.pgh.pa.us

Of course, not doing a catversion bump after beta1 doesn't necessarily
have much value in and of itself. *Promising* to not do a catversion
bump, and then usually keeping that promise definitely has a certain
value, but clearly we are incapable of that.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-06-07 02:32:13 Re: error message diff with Perl 5.22.0
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-06-07 02:07:11 Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode