Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive
Date: 2016-07-01 01:14:15
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRJyz+evOEFm0DDQ=Xaod5NHXd4uHnuUy_4afzpFB1-EQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Took a while. But here we go. The attached version is a significantly
> revised version of my earlier patch. Notably I've pretty much entirely
> revised the code in _mdfd_getseg() to be more similar to the state in
> master. Also some comment policing.

Are you planning to pick this up again, Andres?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-07-01 01:23:15 Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-07-01 01:02:25 Re: initdb issue on 64-bit Windows - (Was: [pgsql-packagers] PG 9.6beta2 tarballs are ready)