| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT syntax issues |
| Date: | 2015-04-28 17:06:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZR=eNBbn=c1_ja2h+xx0KjJS6zUmeHigzAeo3fv+musfg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I am also very sure that every time I'll write this statement I will have to
> look into manual for the names of TARGET and EXCLUDED because they don't
> seem intuitive to me at all (especially the EXCLUDED).
According to wordcount.org, the word "exclude" is ranked # 5796 in the
English language in terms of frequency of use. It's in the vocabulary
of 6 year olds.
I don't know why you find it counter-intuitive, since it perfectly
describes the purpose of the tuple.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-04-28 17:31:55 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0, parser/executor stuff |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-04-28 16:58:23 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT syntax issues |