Re: UPSERT wiki page, and SQL MERGE syntax

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: UPSERT wiki page, and SQL MERGE syntax
Date: 2014-10-03 22:43:18
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQLfPud-9_8_KpeWAvep37+-erosgdeCuBi_JHQTHa4OA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> Yes, it is. I am opposed to using the MERGE syntax for this *because*
> MERGE is useful (independently useful, when done properly), not
> because it is not useful.

As I've mentioned, there is also the practical argument: No one else
does this. That suggests to me that it's hard.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-10-03 22:49:15 Re: UPSERT wiki page, and SQL MERGE syntax
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-10-03 22:42:04 Re: UPSERT wiki page, and SQL MERGE syntax