| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: UPSERT wiki page, and SQL MERGE syntax |
| Date: | 2014-10-02 07:54:19 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZQFCsgFXYAMgM8Syr4zdEASRnwD9kGZ5VQ_5NmSH321OA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> Could you write down all of the discussed syntaxes, using a similar notation
> we use in the manual, with examples on how to use them? And some examples on
> what is possible with some syntaxes, and not with others? That would make it
> a lot easier to compare them.
I've started off by adding varied examples of the use of the existing
proposed syntax. I'll expand on this soon.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2014-10-02 08:19:30 | Re: Yet another abort-early plan disaster on 9.3 |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2014-10-02 07:50:21 | Re: bad estimation together with large work_mem generates terrible slow hash joins |