On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Feng Tian <ftian(at)vitessedata(dot)com> wrote:
> I agree using that using int128 in stock postgres will speed up things too.
> On the other hand, that is only one part of the equation. For example, if
> you look at TPCH Q1, the int128 "cheating" does not kick in at all, but we
> are 8x faster.
I'm curious about how the numbers look when stock Postgres is built
with the same page size as your fork. You didn't mention whether or
not your Postgres numbers came from a standard build.
--
Peter Geoghegan