Re: Sigh, we need an initdb

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sigh, we need an initdb
Date: 2014-06-04 21:14:23
Message-ID: CAM-w4HPq13KRB8SSwV35Nw_LJ+BM0H0B9DnfHdfCPypNJrM8fw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Other things I'd like to change in that case:

Fwiw I tried to use the pg_lsn data type the other day and pretty much
immediately ran into the lack of the btree operator class. Pretty much
the first thing I did when I loaded the data was "select ... order by
lsn".

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-06-04 21:16:28 Re: Sigh, we need an initdb
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-06-04 21:03:52 Re: Sigh, we need an initdb