Re: pgsql: Further tweaking of print_aligned_vertical().

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Further tweaking of print_aligned_vertical().
Date: 2015-12-02 01:16:09
Message-ID: CAM-w4HOPPmMFwYVgKQk957vrovhhf+7ar_mP=bUURcbGd2f0Ew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On 1 Dec 2015 19:48, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> In passing, avoid possible calculation of log10(0). Probably that's
> harmless, given the lack of field complaints, but it seems risky:
> conversion of NaN to an integer isn't well defined.

Am I going to have to fire up the emulator again?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-12-02 02:47:16 Re: pgsql: Further tweaking of print_aligned_vertical().
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-12-01 21:24:55 pgsql: Make gincostestimate() cope with hypothetical GIN indexes.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-02 01:21:45 Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Previous Message Rodrigo Hjort 2015-12-02 00:10:06 Re: Issue on C function that reads int2[] (using "int2vector")