Re: pg_upgrade and epoch

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sergey Burladyan <eshkinkot(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and epoch
Date: 2014-09-05 23:26:55
Message-ID: CAM-w4HNaQBPEqX3Bw3HXT9GQn2+v16Et8oQPmge8kdnbdEqraA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> I have developed the attached patch which causes pg_upgrade to preserve
> the transaction epoch. I plan to apply this for PG 9.5.

I would say this is a simple bug and should be back patched to 9.4 and
9.3. We're only going to continue to get complaints from people
running into this.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-09-05 23:35:42 Re: pg_upgrade and epoch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-09-05 23:22:48 Re: Display of timestamp in pg_dump custom format