Re: GIST create index very very slow

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: worthy7 <worthy(dot)vii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GIST create index very very slow
Date: 2014-08-18 22:19:49
Message-ID: CAM-w4HMF8SLop0TfW8FVuAhFjvSPaknjSSZPhkwR6pHQUxk6LQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Sounds pretty weird

I recall GIST being really slow in the distant past in cases where the
page split choices were really bad. Is timerange an interval? Or a
Range?I wonder if the pagesplit function for some of the newish data
types like ranges might sometimes make bad choices.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2014-08-18 22:25:31 Re: BUG #11208: Refresh Materialized View Concurrently bug using user Postgres
Previous Message bemanuel.pe 2014-08-18 21:28:03 BUG #11208: Refresh Materialized View Concurrently bug using user Postgres