Re: GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 4) and patch for hash index

Hi Thomas,

I have attached the rebased version of patch here.

Kind Regards,
Shubham

On 8 September 2017 at 06:37, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:

> Hi Shubham,
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > If these two hash keys (78988658 and 546789888) mapped to the same
> bucket, this will result in false serialization failure.
> > Please correct me if this assumption about false positives is wrong.
>
> I wonder if there is an opportunity to use computed hash values
> directly in predicate lock tags, rather than doing it on the basis of
> buckets. Perhaps I'm missing something important about the way that
> locks need to escalate that would prevent that from working.
>
> > 3) tested my patch on the current head
>
> This no longer applies, but it's in "Needs review" status in the
> Commitfest. Could you please post a rebased version?
>
> --
> Thomas Munro
> http://www.enterprisedb.com
>