From: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Steven Crandell <steven(dot)crandell(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: hardware upgrade, performance degrade? |
Date: | 2013-03-01 11:13:08 |
Message-ID: | CALt0+o_G4mGQDkbyTSkZOHf96VFzZwzVHarMf0kxXyXu0Uz-5A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi Steven,
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Steven Crandell
<steven(dot)crandell(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Given that we're dealing with new hardware and the fact that this still acts
> a lot like a NUMA issue, are there other settings we should be adjusting to
> deal with possible performance problems associated with NUMA?
On my kernel related thread list, I have:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAOR=d=2tjWoxpQrUHpJK1R+BtEvBv4buiVtX4Qf6we=MHmghxw@mail.gmail.com
(you haven't mentioned if the kernel version is identical for both
servers)
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/50E4AAB1.9040902@optionshouse.com
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/508ACF61.1000602@optionshouse.com
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMAsR=5F45+kj+hw9q+zE7zo=Qc0yBEB1sLXCF0QL+dWt_7KqQ@mail.gmail.com
Might be of some interest to you.
--
Guillaume
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Niels Kristian Schjødt | 2013-03-01 11:43:17 | New server setup |
Previous Message | Steven Crandell | 2013-03-01 09:52:02 | hardware upgrade, performance degrade? |