Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?
Date: 2020-05-07 04:18:35
Message-ID: CALDaNm2J72Eq4xroxx4kA2jXkvgvVcG4-mXtiANe4jb9KfcdxA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 8:33 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>
> I see that commit 33a94bae605edf3ceda6751916f0b1af3e88630a removed
> smgrdounlinkfork() because it was dead code. Should we also remove
> smgrdounlink() now? It also appears to be dead code.
>

I could not find any code reference to smgrdounlink, I feel it can be
removed.

Regards,
Vignesh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message davinder singh 2020-05-07 04:24:51 Re: PG compilation error with Visual Studio 2015/2017/2019
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2020-05-07 04:17:01 Re: +(pg_lsn, int8) and -(pg_lsn, int8) operators