Re: merging some features from plpgsql2 project

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>
Subject: Re: merging some features from plpgsql2 project
Date: 2017-01-10 13:44:22
Message-ID: CAL9smLB+k5rWPVnsHreErQEKZ1mn5_pz_cpHSdOgpkJR=1967w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> It's not like PL/pgSQL is the king of brevity.

This is essentially saying "PL/PgSQL isn't perfect, so we shouldn't try and
make it better". I hear this argument a lot, and as long as people keep
rejecting improvements for this reason they can keep saying it. It's a
self-fulfilling prophecy.

.m

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-01-10 13:48:53 Re: RustgreSQL
Previous Message Jan de Visser 2017-01-10 13:42:29 Re: RustgreSQL