Re: CoC [Final v2]

From: Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "FarjadFarid(ChkNet)" <farjad(dot)farid(at)checknetworks(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Josh Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CoC [Final v2]
Date: 2016-01-24 15:37:48
Message-ID: CAKt_Zft=C5+4B2JwuQzJa6YHJWHy4qkXT-8F-MNw2qNzv=CVuA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I don't agree that this should be about anything more than protecting the
commons.

I also do not want to see the PostgreSQL community pushed into taking
stands on political causes because of people arguing about what viewpoints
are more privileged than others.

I think the CoC is good as it stands.

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 3:53 PM, FarjadFarid(ChkNet) <
farjad(dot)farid(at)checknetworks(dot)com> wrote:

> I do agree with Dave on the points he has made.
>
> Can we please add these so everyone is happy and finalise the CoC?
>
> Thank you.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:
> pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of David E. Wheeler
> Sent: 24 January 2016 00:01
> To: Josh Drake
> Cc: Psql_General (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] CoC [Final v2]
>
> On Jan 22, 2016, at 6:47 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > This document provides community guidelines for a safe, respectful,
> productive, and collaborative place for any person who is willing to
> contribute to the PostgreSQL community. It applies to all "collaborative
> space", which is defined as community communications channels (such as
> mailing lists, IRC, submitted patches, commit comments, etc.).
>
> We need to also cover abuse by members of the community made outside the
> community. Otherwise we’ll appear to give safe harbor to abusers.
>
> > * Participants will be tolerant of opposing views.
>
> This statement can be used in defense of abusive behavior (“I was just
> expressing an opposing view!”).
>
> > * Participants must ensure that their language and actions are free
> > of personal attacks and disparaging personal remarks.
> >
> > * When interpreting the words and actions of others, participants
> > should always assume good intentions.
>
> This statement can be used in defense of abusive behavior (“You should
> recognize the intention behind what I said was benign!”).
>
> > * Behaviour which can be reasonably considered harassment will not be
> tolerated.
>
> Link to enforcement policy will of course be required.
>
> Best,
>
> David
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

--
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor
lock-in.
http://www.efficito.com/learn_more

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message S McGraw 2016-01-24 15:52:40 Re: CoC [Final v2]
Previous Message Geoff Winkless 2016-01-24 15:36:36 Re: CoC [Final v2]