| From: | Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Arguable RLS security bug, EvalPlanQual() paranoia |
| Date: | 2015-09-29 21:25:54 |
| Message-ID: | CAKRt6CQBYFr1da+z12Z9Q6=FMWotzyJhuBJquaU99XOHR+3PXQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>> Thoughts? Trying to keep it straight-forward and provide a simple
>> solution for users to be able to address the issue, if they're worried
>> about it. Perhaps this, plus an additional paragraph which goes into
>> more detail about exactly what's going on?
>
> I'm still thinking about it, but I think you have the right idea here.
I have attached a patch for review that I believe addresses the
documentation side of this issue.
Thoughts or comments?
Thanks,
Adam
--
Adam Brightwell - adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com
Database Engineer - www.crunchydatasolutions.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| transaction-isolation-rls-docs.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-09-29 21:29:38 | Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-09-29 21:13:33 | Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness |