Re: PG11 - Multiple Key Range Partition

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rares Salcudean <rares(dot)salcudean(at)takeofflabs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG11 - Multiple Key Range Partition
Date: 2019-07-10 10:06:39
Message-ID: CAKJS1f-nSS5qghw0WaokHchyjwmV6grE6qg02Ve0RuHOjCUHmw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 21:02, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 5:37 PM David Rowley
> > Thanks for making the test case. It is a bug. There's a problem in
> > match_clause_to_partition_key() where because
> > match_boolean_partition_clause() returns false for the "NOT b"
> > condition when comparing to the first partition key this causes the
> > function to return PARTCLAUSE_UNSUPPORTED which causes the calling
> > function to not bother trying to match that qual up to any other
> > partition key.
>
> Oops, indeed a bug. Should've returned PARTCLAUSE_NOMATCH there.

Here's a first draft fix for this, based on master.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
fix_boolean_partition_pruning.patch application/octet-stream 7.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rares Salcudean 2019-07-10 11:14:32 Re: PG11 - Multiple Key Range Partition
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2019-07-10 09:53:51 Re: BUG #15889: PostgreSQL failed to build due to error MSB8020 with MSVC on windows