Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT
Date: 2016-06-01 13:18:00
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYd6CQBEYuHp6_Szp_sn4im7UaKLSVKaG+D_CRA6iy=6g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > On 1 June 2016 at 11:48, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> Could it be possible to mark PostmasterPid with PGDLLIMPORT on HEAD
> >> and back-branches?
> >
> > Sounds sensible to me.
>
>
​+1

> I don't really want to set a precedent that we'll back-patch
> PGDLLIMPORT markings every time somebody needs a new symbol for some
> extension they are writing
> ​ [...]
>
>
-1​

​David J.​

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2016-06-01 13:20:41 array of domain types
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-06-01 13:08:58 Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types