From: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bert <biertie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: On columnar storage (2) |
Date: | 2016-03-03 09:35:13 |
Message-ID: | CAJrrPGfqF_8d7dCq7AstgyBcKOXvnkGw6ivh+eVPLK83jO==Pw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Bert <biertie(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the performance test. But please not that the patch is 'thrown
> away', and will be totally rewritten. I have no idea of the status of the
> second / third attempt however.
> However, what is interesting is that for some queries this patch is already
> on par with VCI. Which db is that exactly?
The performance report is taken on the patch that is WIP columnar storage
on PostgreSQL database. Only the storage part of the code is finished.
To test the performance, we used custom plan to generate the plans
where it can use the columnar storage. This way we ran the performance
test.
I want to integrate this patch with syntax proposed by Alvaro for columnar
storage and share it with community, before that i want to share the current
storage design with the community for review by preparing some readme
file. I will try to send this soon.
Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-03-03 09:50:03 | Re: pl/pgsql exported functions |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2016-03-03 09:05:06 | proposal: psql autocomplete for casting |