Re: Parallel Seq Scan

From: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Date: 2015-03-10 01:20:36
Message-ID: CAJrrPGd_kswNLJGqrafoL+qiaxnzHZ2O-cC+GmggsM27ZCEZMg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Assuming previous patch is in right direction, I have enabled
> join support for the patch and done some minor cleanup of
> patch which leads to attached new version.

Is this patch handles the cases where the re-scan starts without
finishing the earlier scan?

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-03-10 01:26:11 Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2015-03-10 01:16:37 Re: sepgsql and materialized views