| From: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.3 feature proposal: vacuumdb -j # |
| Date: | 2012-01-17 12:33:06 |
| Message-ID: | CAJKUy5hJLSsJBAii1YaWa7jvGqZY2m78cWOc05xsQuTj0ypUYA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 01:18:53 PM Susanne Ebrecht wrote:
>> I would prefer to have an option that the user is able to tell on how much
>> cores it should be shared. Something like --share-cores=N.
> Uhm. -j # does exactly that or am I missing your point?
>
not really.
if you have 12 cores and you say -j 12 you would have 1 process per
core, with Susanne's suggestion, AFAIUI, you can say -j 12
--shared-cores=6... so you would only use 6 cores of the 12 and have 2
processes per core
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-01-17 12:38:02 | Re: BGWriter latch, power saving |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2012-01-17 12:23:19 | Re: 9.3 feature proposal: vacuumdb -j # |