Re: ALTER TEXT field to VARCHAR(1024)

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:32:09 +0200
> Marius Grama <mariusneo(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Can anybody explain me what happens in the background when the alter
>> statement is executed? I've tried it out on a small copy of the table (70K)
>> and the operation completed in 0.2 seconds.
>> Will the table be completely locked during the execution of the ALTER
>> statement?
>
> I share Gavin's concern that you're fixing this in the wrong place. I expect
> that you'll be better served by configuring the middleware to do the right thing.

I'll pile on here: in almost 20 years of professional database
development I've never had an actual problem that was solved by
introducing or shortening a length constraint to text columns except
in cases where overlong strings violate the data model (like a two
character state code for example). It's a database equivalent of "C
programmer's disease". Input checks from untrusted actors should
happen in the application.

merlin