Re: leakproof

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: leakproof
Date: 2012-02-21 16:02:29
Message-ID: CAHyXU0yuop+X84wRqnmuL50MrDUeTC+jFjZeFkyLnxMh0=TSWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 19, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> Having now spent far too much time in bed with that patch, I'm feeling
>>> like the concept that we are really looking for there is what some
>>> languages call "pure" - that is, there must be no side effects,
>>> whether by throwing exceptions or otherwise.
>>
>> Hmm, "pure" doesn't sound bad to me.  Nice and short.
>>
>
> Technically, "pure" is stronger than "has no side effects":

+1 pure.

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2012-02-21 16:16:16 Re: [Bug fix] postmaster always crashes on a debug version of Windows
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-02-21 15:52:46 Re: leakproof