Re: Streaming replication: sequences on slave seemingly ahead of sequences on master

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Vincent de Phily <vincent(dot)dephily(at)mobile-devices(dot)fr>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, benjamin(dot)vialle(at)mobile-devices(dot)fr
Subject: Re: Streaming replication: sequences on slave seemingly ahead of sequences on master
Date: 2012-05-07 14:05:13
Message-ID: CAHyXU0y29QQPQqLZ3B+nYNy84qPOKtsMorarCk7Sajn83MYytQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> To cross-pollinate with another thread, if temporary tables (and
> insert/delete/update transactions to them) are to be supported on a slave,
> will the applications using those temporary tables expect to be able to use
> 'nextval' on inserts to temporary tables as well?

That's a good question. I re-asked it for you on -hackers on the GTT
thread. Look for follow ups there.

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message leaf_yxj 2012-05-07 14:10:26 Re: How to know there is any ODBC Driver installed in the Linux redhat 5.7 server? Thanks
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2012-05-07 13:59:24 Re: Streaming replication: sequences on slave seemingly ahead of sequences on master