Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1
Date: 2014-08-22 21:36:39
Message-ID: CAHyXU0x-961dSA9eYtf4DVs0aUVbH53PYoxCd_wFvY+3LX54XA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MT2gzzbyWpw
>
> At around 8 minutes, he shows utilization statistics for cube at
> around 1% across their install base. That's higher than I would have
> guessed, so, eh, shows what I know. In any case, I'm not so much
> advocating not caring at all as confining the level of caring to what
> can be done without moving the earth.

cube is a dependency for earthdistance and it's gotten some light
advocacy throughout the years as the 'way to do it'. I tried it
myself way back in the day and concluded a while back that the 'box'
type + gist was better than earthdistance for bounding box operations
-- it just seemed easier to understand and use. If you search the
archives you'll probably find a couple of examples of me suggesting as
such.

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2014-08-22 21:37:51 Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-08-22 21:33:26 Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1