Re: libpq compression

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq compression
Date: 2012-06-14 16:00:31
Message-ID: CAHyXU0wQeXf7WPw+eydh38anoFnX3O7hkFd8wBVii2GSKs1ZVw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com> wrote:
> It doesn't sound like there is a lot of support for this idea, but I
> think it would be nice to get something like lz4
> (http://code.google.com/p/lz4/) or snappy
> (http://code.google.com/p/snappy/) support. Both are BSD-ish licensed.
> It could be useful for streaming replication as well. A hook (as Euler
> mentioned) might be a nice compromise.

There is a lot of support for the idea: it's one of the more requested
features. I think a well thought out framework that bypassed the
dependency issues via plugging might get some serious traction.
Emphasis 'on well thought out' :-).

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-06-14 16:17:26 Re: [RFC][PATCH] Logical Replication/BDR prototype and architecture
Previous Message Dave Page 2012-06-14 15:59:26 Re: Minimising windows installer password confusion