| From: | Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda(at)truviso(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: GIT move |
| Date: | 2012-01-25 17:54:06 |
| Message-ID: | CAH_hXRbcPhxqqy6SH7wTQSaWNPtGandna+rVcs0XhanRobM6Hw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
So git.postgresql.org offers nothing but git hosting, right? Do you
see no value in at least mirroring there from github? This would be a
one-liner, and easily cron-able. I guess the downside is that
currently there seems to be no way to indicate that the
git.postgresql.org repo is *not* the canonical one and that mirrored
updates may lag.
Other than that, github sounds good. With the pages feature (
http://pages.github.com/ ), it should even be possible to move large
parts of the website there. For what it's worth, I see no need for a
-commits list.
Barring any unforeseen problems, the timeline looks good to me. The
keyword expansion turned out to be a cvs2git bug, but the maintainer
committed a fix; I'll try that tonight.
---
Maciek Sakrejda | System Architect | Truviso
1065 E. Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 215
Foster City, CA 94404
(650) 242-3500 Main
www.truviso.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2012-01-25 19:26:57 | Re: GIT move |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2012-01-25 12:31:32 | Re: Java 1.4 |