| From: | Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda(at)truviso(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | otran <otran(at)switchfly(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: oid int issue with CachedRowSet upgrading from JDBC 8.4 to 9.1 |
| Date: | 2012-03-28 21:16:45 |
| Message-ID: | CAH_hXRa8Hngkn0q32-q7T7rD6vQ0fSB2_Qsw2-SsJBfedpHV7w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
> Owen,
>
> So did I miss something ? You said that your OID's were larger than an
> int didn't you ?
>
> If so even if the signature of the method is correct how do you expect
> it to work ?
>
> Dave Cramer
>
> dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
> http://www.credativ.ca
For anyone interested, I think the issue was that while OIDs are
32-bit entities, they are unsigned, so they could not be treated as
Java (signed) ints beyond 2^31-1.
The nature of Kris' patch [1] seems to support that.
[1]: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/commit/4d60ea616eff61262721176db6e77819a23f6dc2
---
Maciek Sakrejda | System Architect | Truviso
1065 E. Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 215
Foster City, CA 94404
(650) 242-3500 Main
www.truviso.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Maciek Sakrejda | 2012-03-28 21:18:21 | Re: oid int issue with CachedRowSet upgrading from JDBC 8.4 to 9.1 |
| Previous Message | Maciek Sakrejda | 2012-03-28 20:53:34 | Re: Bug with PreparedStatements using EXTRACT function |