Re: oid int issue with CachedRowSet upgrading from JDBC 8.4 to 9.1

Owen,

So did I miss something ? You said that your OID's were larger than an
int didn't you ?

If so even if the signature of the method is correct how do you expect
it to work ?

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 5:59 PM, otran <otran(at)switchfly(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> This did work when we were using the 8.4 jdbc driver. With 9.1, we see a
> call com.sun.rowset.CachedRowSetImpl.initMetaData(CachedRowSetImpl.java:701)
> that is trying to read the OID now when building this metadata.
>
> So CacheRowSetImpl is just highlighting a difference between the 8.4 and 9.1
> jdbc drivers in terms of the implementation of grabbing the initMetaData.
>
> Thanks,
> Owen
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/oid-int-issue-with-CachedRowSet-upgrading-from-JDBC-8-4-to-9-1-tp5551763p5551923.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - jdbc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc